
First off I'd like to thank everyone for discussing and sharing with us their ideas during the course of our top 50 titles. I'm always curious to see some numbers, as well as to answer people when it comes to our preferences, so I wanted to take a minute and answer a few things on my day off.
"How did you guys vote?"The process worked like this: I asked everyone in the staff to name a bunch of anime that they felt deserved to be on the list. I seeded in some titles, and we had a list of about 90 different items.
From there, I asked everyone to list their top ten, in numbered order. Once I got those back, I assigned point values to each rank. #1 got 10 points, while #10 got 1. From there, I simply added things up and that's how we got our list.
I did some tinkering and adjusting in the list, either because some items were ranked just too high or some didn't really make sense to be on the list. They were more out-of-left-field-type titles, so it wasn't like I cut
Kino's Journey or anything.
"Why wasn't X on the list?"We probably didn't watch it.
Really, that's only true for some of the titles (
Kaiba). When you're restricting yourself to 10 choices, invariably there are going to be another 10 series you really want to see on the list, but not quite as bad as the ones you've picked.
So, in the end, some series did fall through the cracks, and could have filled up other slots, but such is life. It's something I've learned this year, and I can carry that knowledge with me for whenever I want to do a big project like this.
"X should have been higher/lower!"Clearly, numbers are serious business.
"Your list was horrible. You should apologize for how horrendous your top 50 was!"The only apology that I can offer is this: I'm sorry that every member of the staff has not watched every single anime that has come out over the last ten years, and then proceeded to vote for it in your favor.
Now that I've gotten that bit of sarcasm out of the way, I wanted to get down to some numbers.
The StudiosIn the world of anime, it's usually easiest to assign a show' success to the studio that produced it, rather than a single director or writer. So here's a list of all the titles that we highlighted and the studios that produced them. Ghibli, Madhouse and Comix Wave got a bit of a bump because they encased 3-4 titles in one rank.
Madhouse: 11
Bones: 5
Production IG: 5
JC Staff: 4
Comix Wave Inc: 3
Gainax: 3
Gonzo: 3
Kyoto Animation: 3
Studio Ghibli: 3
A-1 Pictures: 2
Shaft: 2
Sunrise: 2
AIC: 1
Artland: 1
Brain's Base: 1
Imagin: 1
Palm Studio: 1
Satelight: 1
Shirogumi Inc: 1
Studio Comet: 1
Studio Pierrot: 1
XEBEC: 1
Clearly, we're Madhouse fanboys. It's official. The studio is one that's gigantic and yet allows for so much freedom and innovation, we can't help but love it. The studio's president is a regular guest at Otakon, so I'm hoping that we'll get a good interview with him this year.
The yearsPeople claimed we were biased towards more recent stuff, so I went ahead and plugged in each season that a show aired during into a list, and came out with this yearly breakdown.
2000: 3
2001: 5
2002: 9
2003: 7
2004: 14
2005: 11
2006: 14
2007: 23
2008: 12
2009: 9
2007 sure produced a lot of good anime. Or at least a lot of shows that aired solely/mainly in 2007 with multiple seasons did well.
Not all of us have been here for the last ten years in the anime scene, and those that have aren't necessarily disposed to solely old titles. Well, except for Tim. But he's ancient. So, that's how we get the breakdown. But it's interesting to see the years that didn't do so well: 2001, 2003, 2005. I say 2005 because that had a lot of spill-over between other years, and that's why it's numbers are higher.
In conclusionI hope you enjoyed our list for the fun that it was, and you'll stick around on the site. For whatever disagreements you have with us here on the site, you're more than welcome to share them. We're not the type of place who will ban you for hurting our egos -- we value the legitimate discussion, as long as you refrain from ad homenim attacks.