Tim Rogers' rant about everything that's wrong with Japan over at Kotaku has been up for a while now, and I hadn't been sure what to make of it. It's not the kind of article I feel compelled to direct people to read. It's not the kind of article I feel compelled to disagree with passionately- not having lived in Japan, I'm kind of disqualified to take part in the argument anyway. What I've realized is that the real value of the article isn't so much Rogers' commentary as the interesting discussion that it's provoked- both on Kotaku and elsewhere.
The extent to which Japanese culture has taken a nosedive, if it has at all, is a ridiculous monster of a topic that I won't even attempt to deal with at this time. However, there is a part of this discussion that's immediately relevant to many of us here at Japanator:
Long ago, manga aspired to be like Dragon Ball Z: graphically iconic, with a story more coherent than it probably needed to be. Now there's the ADHD-addled Dragon-Ball-Z-inspired One Piece, a manga for the Twitter age if there ever was one.
--Tim Rogers, Kotaku
So the high watermark of Japanese manga was Dragon Ball Z? Of all the things one could have picked, DBZ is now the symbol of a bygone era of artistic superiority? I'm not insulting the works of Akira Toriyama, but really; his standard of reference for superior manga is something that was "more coherent than it probably needed to be?" Does this mean that DBZ was superlative by forfeiting it's genre-derived right to incoherence?
I'm not terribly knowledgeable about this franchise, so I'm going to have to assign some homework for you DBZ scholars out there: How coherent was DBZ? Furthermore, was it more or less coherent than it needed to be, for a given value of coherent? Define your units; show all work.