I don't know if I'd be going JUST to look, but I do know I wouldn't be able to stop myself. I mean, how can you stop yourself from looking at boobies? It just doesn't work that way.

but honestly, what kind of women go to this sento?
i'd imagine that all the good looking ones know its mixed and avoid it.
then again... there could be the case of some super hot babes who want to relish in the fact that they are what they are.

Most people that go to the mixed baths anyway are grandmas and grandpas. So if there is a staring problem who are they staring at...

so what if men are looking... boobies are nice =)

Assuming there are any decent looking women, then many guys would realize this is the best approach: Don't stare. Through this reverse logic, the women that are tired of the staring will notice that you aren't staring and there is an increased chance of having a normal conversation with them, thereby leading further into positive conversation. Thus, in time it may be possible to get much farther than simple staring.....if you know what I mean.


On a more serious look though, what on earth are these people thinking? Are they seriously trying to get guys to stop being perverts? because if so, they are flat out idiots. All guys are perverts, and any guy that says he isn't is either a liar or a gay.

"All guys are perverts, and any guy that says he isn't is either a liar or a gay."

Thats not true, you can be gay and STILL be a pervert.

no staring at hoo-hoo's or haa-haa's? impossible. besides - there's nothing stopping girls from staring at decent looking guys; its more or less a equal exchange.

course...i'm not too keen on the concept of public bathing in the first place. always assumed when you go into a public bath, you get what's coming. women, don't complain; it's what you asked for when you stepped into a pool of naked people. seriously.

It's a hot spring, not a public bath. There's probably a public bath area that is separated from the springs themselves.

But I agree. Why go in the first place? It's Aomori, so there are plenty of other good sex-separated hot springs where you don't have to be watched. This is like going to a nude beach and complaining about indecency. Ridiculous. :/

I have a couple of ideas:

Stare back! If a guy is looking at your boobs all you gotta do is stare back at him until he notices, then chances are he'll turn red and look away.

If that doesn't work try talking, that'll get his attention.

If all else fails you could always just desensitize us to them by letting them be free all the time!

Or you...could just...you know...go bathe somewhere else.

"Thats not true, you can be gay and STILL be a pervert."

My statement does not say that they are mutually exclusive since I used the boolean "either" and "or". Now if I had said "xor" THEN that would have been me saying that gays can't be perverts, but currently it's like I'm saying perversion and straight guys are a square and gays are rectangles.

Wait a sec, who cares?! This is a conversation about boobs!! *squish*squish*

Yay for Opai!

Large concrete dividing walls and gator-filled moats, or get used to it: one's options in this case.

Yes, it's principally old people in mixed baths, but I've been told more than once (read: billions of times) that boobs are boobs. Funbags indeed!

the very defination of the word 'either' means one or the other, which is the exact representation of a mutually exclusive event, because both events cannot happen (or not happen) at the same time.

"All guys are perverts, and any guy that says he isn't is either a liar or a gay."

your statement was mutually exclusive because you used 'either'. you're saying that all guys are perverts unless they are (liars or gays), which excludes gays from being perverts. how was it not mutually exclusive?

another interpertation focuses on their speech.

parameters:

-all guys are perverts.
-there are 2 possabilities: they will either admit they are perverts or they would not.
-IF they do not admit that they are perverts, then they are either liars or gays

in that case, i will assume for a moment that all straits are perverts and will openly disclose that they are perverts (...although that may not be true)

according to those parameters, gay people will not openly admit that they are perverts. that statement fails to categorize them, therefore according to your logic, they cannot exist. i can say for certain that they in fact do exist and openly proclaim their perversion. does that not invalidate your statement?

what about gay liars? according to your statement, you've established that straits can lie or tell the truth (admit that they're perverts) but gay people can only say that they are not perverted.

its all because of the outrage that these outrageous women caused that i'm arguing with other people. DOWN WITH THE OPPRESSION; MAWR PWR TO TEH BEWBS!!!

Wow...

Please tell me you're doing this for fun because that's all I was trying to do. I was trying to make a quick overly computer-engineering-major focused joke....

Learn C++ sometime, then you'll get it.

isn't that why we all hang out at japanator.com?

i remember a bit of logic gates when i took com tech in gd 10. i could appreciate the joke, but my course in stats compelled me to argue. blame those fuggin midterms.

Hahahha, I agree with you there. Finals stink...

what anime is the cover pic from?