On to the point, I'm still not overly worried about this. Its tragic, but an industry with that pumps that much money into the (struggling) economy will not be troubled by this too long. Simply moving headquarters is the most obvious and drastic step, but even restricting their sales as per the law will start some pretty noticeable waves in the market. I have faith in Kadokawa's push back.
tl:dr: This sucks.
In the end, this law isn't to protect people, it's just there because some people said they didn't like it. That's a stupid reason to create any law. They really don't have much right to, but they'll do it anyways.
That said, this feels like it's so vague it'll be ineffective.
Also, I was under the impression Otakus made up a lot of the vote. I'm sure they won't be happy about people who let this pass...
Also, swimsuits? Really? WTF.
Concerning the crowd that complains about depictions of fetishes that don't float their boats, that is fine; however, there are those that who do enjoy such extreme ends of the fetish market, id est those that typically would be illegal in a real life scenario. I am of the mind that those individuals need a fictional outlet for said fetishes. Perhaps some will graduate to real life activities someday however unfortunate that may be. But you would be a fool to think that without such fictional depictions these individuals would not exist. So by all means should they not be offered something that might stem their desires before they overflow into reality?
The human psyche is far to complex to blame all the malignancies that can surface upon fictional works. To do so is to shirk a large aspect of what it is to human, which by definition are deviant. Those law makers, in any nation, who think they are protecting anybody by limiting "lewd" materials are far to arrogant and naive to be in a position of power. I hardly think the first ever rapist/pedophile/>insert sexual deviancy here< had just finished reading the latest ero-manga before he decided to commit to his act.
Hey, can anyone think of something really angry for me to listen to while I drink? This is the only one that I'm thinking of for some reason:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQXLs9sbyM0
Hope somebody can think of something else!
To celebrate what was once dirty, I implore you to watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tpb1U6GFSgw
As for their economy...yeah, they've screwed the pooch big time.
It's so clear that far to many people don't seem to understand the implications of this law could have. It's the slippery slopes of politics. Crack a history text sometime and you will see many horrible injustices started when people misjudged the ramifications of one event.
What's next? Kempeitai 2.0 looking over your shoulder to check your reading matterial for offensive images?
In any case, this is a bad day for artistic freedom.
Anything that is of artistic merit will offend someone. Now that they've decided to limit the amount of artistic expression that can be expressed in one way, they'll be able to extend that to others.
If they can say sexual situations damage the development of youth, they can easily apply that to violence, to other illegal activities like stealing and vandalism, and even to just general mischief - all using this bill as justification.
It's a precedent that has been set - animation, comics and video games are not afforded the same creative freedom as other mediums, and thus, they can be regulated to the point where anything that might offend someone can be 'taken care of'.
Which is kind of stupid telling people school is bad idea for a story setting but main the issue is the sexual content in that story not the setting.Japanese Publishers are being force not to make Manga's with School theme stories because of this Law.
*ooh, nice and vague
People have read the article. The problem is that people (including myself) are probably too furious to write something that may appear intelligent.
Well that's just plain not true.
Half of what some'a y'all are saying is either unsubstantiated assumptions or outright fallacies, and I really wish y'all'd stop and think before posting sensationalism.
But when game and animation studios start to leave Tokyo (I really do think this will happen, simply because relocating would save them far more money than staying would) there could be some pretty serious backlash.
Will watch with interest...
You can even find someone that is offended by the Mona Lisa.
And everyone that is saying they won't miss the panty shots, does this somehow exclude excessive violence? I haven't seen anything saying that this bill doesnt due to how vague it is.
Seriously, You have people in the US getting Harry Potter banned because of witchcraft and you don't think you can find someone to be offended by anything?
Artistic expression is all about pushing boundaries and making people think. You can't do this if you don't challenge peoples' values, and if you challenge peoples' values, you are going to step on more than a few toes.
Yes, we are reacting strongly, because this bill is the slippery slope. There's no other reason that this could have been established other than the TMG deciding that its ability to restrict filthy otaku (while leaving "proper" media like live-action film and books untouched) was not enough.
And you DO have the whole bill. If you had bothered to visit Kanemitsu's site, which Josh has linked to repeatedly in the coverage, you'd see the most comprehensive coverage you can get for English speakers, even with translated editorials by legal analysts. It's the next best thing to your being able to speak perfect Japanese and reading the bill yourself, and it ain't pretty.
@Everyone who thinks this is a good thing because OH FINALLY WE'LL GET SOME GOOD ANIME HERP DERP DERP
"And you expect the absence of fanservice and ecchi to be replaced by deep plot and characterization...how?
While yes, anime that use H as a crutch would be less likely to reach production, that doesn't suddenly make deep anime more popular or profitable. Instead the bill might well kill those shallow, profitable anime that make studios the money they need to fund auteur productions.
You're making the mistake of thinking that people will naturally gravitate to "better" work once the stuff they like is banned. That's simply not true. If all TV programs except Dancing with the Stars or some other crap were erased from the earth, you still can't assume that Dancing's ratings would suddenly skyrocket. Sure, the fans would still watch, as would some other people that have nothing better to do, but for the most part people would just stop watching TV at all.
No, no no. You think you're supporting a restriction on smut, but what you're actually doing is tacitly approving the policing of thought. What if the TMG decided that a show like Redline "grossly exaggerated and glorified" the influence of criminal activity in competitive racing? Harmful! Banned!
What if the TMG decided that Eden of the East supported terrorism? Harmful! Banned!
MAKE NO MISTAKE. It will NOT stop at sex. Ishihara practically shouted it to the heavens. Anything that doesn't align with his moral compass (INCLUDING homosexuals), he will attempt to eventually expand this bill to cover."
@Everyone that says "Let's wait and see what they do with all this newfound power"
This isn't an issue of finally giving Tokyo the ability to reign in the otaku. THEY ALREADY HAVE THAT ABILITY. Like Ichigo during a training arc, they've worked some magic and made that power STRONGER. Unnecessarily so!
Let's take a hypothetical situation, and say the bill was applied to homosexuality instead.
The expansion of the bill's scope is the equivalent of going from being able to restrict the sale of Kuso Miso Technique (look it up), if it somehow hasn't been labeled as porn already (it has), to being able to restrict appearances by Bruno Tolioni...because, y'know, he's TOTALLY gay, amirite?
This is how vague the whole thing has become, and I see neither reason or practicality in it, except to satisfy the moral panicking of a group of senile, prudish old men.
Call me arrogant if you like but if it has to be one way or the other I would certainly chose my own sense of morals and justice over that of a group. The anime industry would be fine in such a situation completely untouched by what I would consider objectionable. Not that I enjoy all aspects of it I simply see no harm done by fiction context is not important.
@Marlin Clock I am not sure I consider what the7k to be an absolute(would have to give it some thought) but I have met people who would likely consider everything I have seen that has come out of Japan offensive. Don't underestimate differences in culture and morality. This law could devastate the industry by its vagueness it could also be nothing and prove to be a simple scare tactic. While we could be missing some facts as I see it at the moment the writing is on the wall as to how potentially devastating the nature of this law is. I don't think crying about it is really being sensationalistic so much as genuine panic over something of value being trampled upon.
In terms of nudity, we mostly see the breasts and that might still be intact as long as its not considered harmful, so there are chances of some aspects of ecchi might still be around except just with no borderline stuff. It will just depend on the target age group and considering that showing the chest area of anyone under 18 is not considered child porn in Japan and there is a regulation for that already according to a link in one of the articles that Josh linked us. There is a chance that seeing full boobs whether ginormous, big, just right, small, or flat will still be intact.
To those who want to continue their stuff as it is without worrying about the sales, relocate to areas outside of Tokyo. For now we will just have to see what standards they will consider when July comes around. If all goes to chaos, a revolution will arise until everything comes to a better resolution after the battle is over or we will hear about a new area of Japan being the new center place for anime and manga.
Even then, it is still the parents fault for not preparing their kids and teaching them right since its better to teach them and have them face the truth than to hide secrets out of fear of corruption. They are never too young to learn anything new and trust will be an important factor in this teaching.
(Yes, I do realize whackjob religious right wingers will use obscenity laws, but I'm trying to lighten the mood here.)
Anime, manga, and video games as they are now are not the source of Japan's otaku-based social ills - they're merely the symptoms of the real illness, and should point to the actual problems in society that have lead to declining birth rates and the upswing of "herbivore men" in the country. The state of the modern otaku is the proverbial canary in the coal mine, not the nexus of all that is evil.
My shining sun-fist is raised in brotaku-ism with the publishers and artists here. I don't like or approve of sex crime, but I reject, completely, the idea of singling out games, manga, and anime as the newly-minted "second class citizens" of storytelling media. That is patently bullshit, and I hope the publishing companies concentrate all fire on not only sinking this, but revealing those involved in its creation look like the buffoons with only sketchy research to stand on that they are.
Haters gonna hate, but creators gonna create!
Secondly, all you folks saying things pertaining to Japan's economy, you guys do realize that the entertainment industry makes up a miniscule portion of the Japanese economy right? Manga and anime or drops of water in an ocean of services, fishing, and every sort of manufacturing imaginable. You know nothing about economics. Please stop talking about it.
Your post reads like a Rorschach test that for some reason makes the words "Jews", "Communists" and "Trade Unionists" pop up in my head. Funny, hmm?
People also need to remember that just because it's 'freedom of expression' (I don't see how sexualized loli's are "an expression") doesn't mean it's really okay. For example, early cartoons in America often depicted blacks as stereotypical and in blackface; Jews were usually shown with over sized noses and were always plotting on how to obtain money. These were accepted back then because a large portion of society thought it was okay- was it? Based on many comments here, I'm getting that expression, no matter what it is, should be allowed simply because it's expression. "No children were harmed" some say. Well, no blacks/Jews were TECHNICALLY harmed as a DIRECT result of those cartoons, should those bans be lifted from those as well?
My point is, when you're in a business, and your business is attracting large amounts of profit and attention, you're going to have to keep it... a little more.. "tame". Anime is getting more and more popular in Japan and across the globe. And let's be honest- sexy shit, violence, WHATEVER; in big business, it's not really always about expression, it's about money- and if sex and violence is what the consumer wants, that's what they get. That's why it sells so well- because that's what a lot of otaku want. If were to lose interest in loli-themed anime/related media, I'm sure that big business would not produce it as much.
But for the record, no I'm not some anime-Nazi, "back in the days" old fart. I like my share of "adult entertainment", all I'm saying is, with anime becoming ever more so popular all around the world...
What did you expect?

A look at: Blue Exorcist DVD Vol.3
Vivid Covers
Kinda Coicent, Five Numbers
Devil Survivor 2
Kinda Dragon Ball Z Kai Part 7
Cherry Tree High Comedy Club
Disgaea 3: Absence of Detention
Doesn't Recommend: Shocking Loud Voice
Black Butler II and OVAs
Black Butler Season 1
Okami-san
Silent Hill Downpour
A look at: Ys: The Oath in Felghana PC
Ultimate Marvel Versus Capcom 3
May'n - Heat
Jiro Dreams of Sushi
.hack//Quantum
Sekirei Pure Engagement
Final Fantasy XIII-2
Hyperdimension Neptunia Mk2


































2:00 PM on 12.15.2010
|



