FMA: The Sacred Star of Milos
A look at: Blue Exorcist DVD Vol.3
Vivid Covers
Kinda Coicent, Five Numbers
Devil Survivor 2
Kinda Dragon Ball Z Kai Part 7
Cherry Tree High Comedy Club
Disgaea 3: Absence of Detention
Doesn't Recommend: Shocking Loud Voice
Black Butler II and OVAs
Black Butler Season 1
Okami-san
Silent Hill Downpour
A look at: Ys: The Oath in Felghana PC
Ultimate Marvel Versus Capcom 3
May'n - Heat
Jiro Dreams of Sushi
.hack//Quantum
Sekirei Pure Engagement
Final Fantasy XIII-2
FMA: The Sacred Star of Milos
9:00 PM on 11.02.2010
|
Wait, just what law did this violate? And this would only be outdone if the Butterfree Ash released was then shot as it flew towards the sun.
He has no one to blame but himself. If he obtained copyrighted material that was not to be released before a set date, he should know better than to broadcast that to the world.
Again true... and that's is why I feel a bit sorry for him. Was he doing it just to get attention...? well he got it... A lot of people that do this type of shit to me are just looking for attention in the end. He had to have known the if found out there would be some kind of reproduction. And if so then well... what can you say, people do stupid stuff for all kind's of lame reasons.
I am reminded of the incident where Apple unleashed a swat team on a Gizmodo journalist for holding an iPhone that had yet to be released.
"In Lovell v. City of Griffin, 303 U.S. 444 (1938), Chief Justice Hughes defined the press as, “every sort of publication which affords a vehicle of information and opinion.”
But this is Japan. And the US already belongs to the corporations. So even if you stumble upon really cool information which you are not obliged to hide - shut up and enjoy the spoils yourself.
"In Lovell v. City of Griffin, 303 U.S. 444 (1938), Chief Justice Hughes defined the press as, “every sort of publication which affords a vehicle of information and opinion.”
But this is Japan. And the US already belongs to the corporations. So even if you stumble upon really cool information which you are not obliged to hide - shut up and enjoy the spoils yourself.
@Rewarp
Unfortunately, the people that leak such information aren't journalists and don't benefit from the shield laws available to them in order to be able to post such information.
Being a tech journalist, I deal with and get my hands on internal documentation, but Gizmodo was a special case as Gawker Media paid for the iPhone 4 prototype which is a violation of California's penal code regarding the reception of stolen property.
Gizmodo may get press access to major events but Gawker Media really isn't in the business of practicing journalism on the level of a newspaper which is why they're open to such liability.
Unfortunately, the people that leak such information aren't journalists and don't benefit from the shield laws available to them in order to be able to post such information.
Being a tech journalist, I deal with and get my hands on internal documentation, but Gizmodo was a special case as Gawker Media paid for the iPhone 4 prototype which is a violation of California's penal code regarding the reception of stolen property.
Gizmodo may get press access to major events but Gawker Media really isn't in the business of practicing journalism on the level of a newspaper which is why they're open to such liability.
@HSaabedra
So technically, as long as the information is relayed to a certified journalist for free, the source of the information would be protected by the rights of journalists, and the news can be published, right?
So technically, as long as the information is relayed to a certified journalist for free, the source of the information would be protected by the rights of journalists, and the news can be published, right?
@Rewarp
Pretty much on the money, except journalists aren't certified. Checkbook journalism is such a can of worms that many just stay away from it as a matter of ethics.
It's pretty simple: Get info from source, analyze info, scrub identifiable info, then post with analysis. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Pretty much on the money, except journalists aren't certified. Checkbook journalism is such a can of worms that many just stay away from it as a matter of ethics.
It's pretty simple: Get info from source, analyze info, scrub identifiable info, then post with analysis. Lather, rinse, repeat.
