DestructoidJapanatorTomopopFlixist


The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Anime Logos photo

Some people never notice them. Some people are bothered by them non-stop. Logos are everywhere and part of your life, whether you like it or not. Probably within hand's reach right now are several objects with logos plastered on them: an iPod, a hard drive, a book, or your car keys.

Of course, many anime have logos as well (and they're often very type-focused), and many of them have become fairly iconic over the years. And while some of them are good, possibly even great, many more are terrible abominations of design. After the jump I take you on a little trip by some bad logos, some good ones, and a few awful ones – and of course, I can't help but try to fix them up a little bit along the way.

THE BAD:

bleach

The Bleach logo. It's fairly well-known, and has inspired many parodies (although those are probably due more to the popularity of the series, not the logo itself). The original has two outlines around the type, high-contrast blue and red being the focal point, and some duplicated-and-flipped flames coming out of each end. If they weren't blue and white I might've thought they were stolen from a motorcycle helmet.

It's certainly not an ugly logo, but it could stand to use some clean-ups. The few adjustments I suggest are dropping the flames and thick blue background and let the type breathe a bit. You can still keep your gradients, but let's just tone everything down a bit. In the end, the new version becomes more readable from a distance (a good thing for logos, try looking at the thumbnail and seeing which one is easier to read... or just step really far away from your screen) and less tacky at the same time!

pluto

First, let's ignore that this isn't an anime.

I hate to do this, but yes, Pluto. I adore this manga, so I criticize the logo out of love.

The original suffered from just plain weird typography. Out of balance, strangely shaped, and generally baffling. I realize what they were trying to go for, but it ended up very wrong. The texture and contrast with the red subtitle were the stronger points, so I kept those in my suggestion.

The "U" is retained, as is the red type. However, it still might be better to go to a plain "U" but I feel that might destroy some of the uniqueness. Separating the letters is vital for its readability, here. The original had overlapping letters that needed those strange white cutouts to make it understandable, so I skipped that entirely. In the end, the changes I made aren't perfect, but they'll go a long way in helping the logo stay readable.

naruto

Ah, Naruto.

Take a look at what I changed: only three things! Firstly, I altered the gradient in the type. Instead of each letter having its own gradient passing horizontally, I changed them all to a vertical gradient. That alone made a marked improvement. The second thing I opted to alter was the pink rings in the background. Instead of getting rid of them, I changed their color to a sky blue, which creates a much better contrast as well (as you probably know, blue and orange are opposites, and they're one of the best sets of contrasting colors you can find).

The last thing I did was remove the subtitle. It was unneeded in this situation, and the word "Naruto" is perfectly legible. That turned out pretty well!

THE GOOD:

souleater

Hardly any changes here! And, the logo on the right is an official logo as it is (I've seen it used on some merchandise occasionally). All that really needs to happen is a complete changeover to the logo on the right – and even then, the left logo isn't that bad either. It's still surprisingly readable with the bar going through the middle, and only loses its clarity when you start stepping back.

The soul icon in the middle is also great, and if you've read Soul Eater you know that this visual is used a lot in the series, and each character's soul is depicted as one of these floating orbs.

A good logo all around!

deathnote

Oh my god, NO CHANGES?!

Yes, it's true. Death Note has a great logo, as least as far as manga and anime go. It's a grungy, off-kilter logo that does a good job at evoking the tone of the series itself. It even reads fairly well vertically, which is hard for most titles, but due to the nature of the logo it works!

You'll be pleased to know Bakuman also has an excellent logo, but I won't get into that here.

THE UGLY:

onepiece

Now, now, before you string me up and hang me, hear me out. I'll explain why.

One, a logo needs to be readable, as I've said perhaps 30 times already. Once you back away from the One Piece logo, about the only thing you can clearly make out is the skull-and-crossbones and Luffy's silhouette, and that's just because it's bright red. Two, the typography is, sadly, an absolute mess. The "E"s and "P" seem to be from the same font, but the "N" and "C" look like totally different weights. Then, with the "O" being dedicated to the skull-and-crossbones, and the "E" becoming an anchor, you're left with a mishmash of seemingly random letters.

Since the skull-and-crossbones is the most important part here, I retained that in my version. And since we already have a reference to Luffy in that (the hat) let's drop the silhouette as well. The bars on the top and bottom weren't helping, so I tossed those as well. The next step was to choose a unifying typeface, which here is Condensed Rockwell Bold. I'm still not sure if it's the best choice, but anything is better than the old type. 

If I had more time, perhaps I'd try to find a way to loop the rope back around the type, or reintroduce the anchor, but for now this is a huge improvement.

-

Hate my redesigns? Think I got it right? Still mad I said the One Piece logo sucks? Vent in the comments! Let me know what you think! Who knows, if it's popular, this feature might happen again!


The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Anime Logos photo
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Anime Logos photo
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Anime Logos photo
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Anime Logos photo
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Anime Logos photo
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Anime Logos photo


MOAR top stories:




Legacy Comments

Having no experience in graphical design, I have no choice but to take your word for it.
Something about the text being rotated in Death Note gives it a an interesting look without ruining the readability.

I look forward to seeing what new logos you will dig up as you give us your insight on them as a Graphic Designer.
Someone doesn't like katakana? While I do agree with the One Piece changes, the Soul Eater and Naruto one's just seem a bit empty without the katakana. The Naruto logo would be better with the katakana back in place, and the Soul Eater logo would be better if it was reposition below the English Characters. Those are just my opinions though, but come on everyone knows katakana is cool.....and can be very difficult to read sometimes
Changing the One Piece Logo takes out the nautical theme and leaves the skeleton just looking really dumb.
as an illustrator, i can see where most of these changes make sense, though I do think the red silhouette of luffy and perhaps the anchor should stay. the quirkiness of the original echoes the odd nature of the series, while the new one makes it look...a touch too sophisticated? but yes, the type is better.

With the new type, I can read the One Piece logo much better - but I agree with Crystal. The anchor and the silhouette are both important parts of the logo because they set the theme.
I recall the SBS in one of the early volumes of One Piece where Oda recounted with that many early fan letters he got, the writer thought the name of the manga was "NEP ECE" because of the logo's bizarre typography/iconography mix. I got a kick out of that.

The new Naruto logo looks really nice, I agree that individual gradients on every letter are pretty nasty.

Agreed , Except for One Piece.

the Original Looked Good.
"The last thing I did was remove the subtitle. It was unneeded in this situation, and the word 'Naruto' is perfectly legible."

Um, unneeded by whom? Japanese people read that, you know... Disagree with all changes except the Naruto gradient fix and pink-to-blue change.
@Crystal

Yeah, like I said in the article, I think the rope and anchor could be reintroduced somewhere, I just didn't have the time to add it.

My tendency to be a minimalistic designer bites me in the ass sometimes.
You have to keep in mind that some of these shows are made for kids, which is why you have things that are excessively eye-catching and outlandish. Also, you say they have to be readable. From a Japanese reader's standpoint no, they don't, because they might not actually be able to read it, especially the kids.
the only i felt you improved was the one piece one...most the others you simply removed the japanese text
Basically, you bastardise the good designs and put in bad designs of yours. Except for Pluto, I would just move the red text down below the original PLUTO wording.
All very good modifications, especially on that Naruto logo. It simply doesn't make any sense to have a gradient in each individual letter/ in a designers POV, you also would think that they'd make the secondary color blue, I mean c'mon- it's orange.

I actually preferred the original One Piece logo- it looks more unique and interesting. The only thing I'd take off is that rope.

but yeah, good stuff. I wonder what YOU'RE going to do as a career! (of not already..)
The pink swirl in the Naruto logo makes sense because a slice of naruto (or narutomaki, a type of surimi, like crab sticks) usually has a red or pink swirl on it.
Nice modifications although I think that removing Luffy's silhouette and the anchor from the One Piece logo loses some of the personality of the original. The font change on the other hand looks great.
As an aspiring graphic designer/illustrator/"god knows what but it definitely has to do with art", I applaud some of these designs. Simplification while still retaining the heart of the show is an important thing. At the same time though, I think removing the Japanese was a bit unnecessary and while it may make things easier for us English speakers, these logos were likely orginally designed for Japanese audiences so it the Japanese should be left in. I mean, if there was a great logo in Japanese with an English subtitle, I'd appreciate the English being left in. Then again, this is more semantics and legibility than design itself.

As for One Piece, I like the font change, but you lose some of the soul without the anchor and the swirling rope on the bottom. It just feels too empty without all that visual clutter of the original logo.

But once again, these are some nice alternative modifications and as the actual graphic designer, you probably understand this stuff better than me anyways.
first of all, editing a logo is NOT legal, copyright issue comes into place (and I think you knew that since your a graphic designer, I presume?)
even IF its your own work.
The least thing designer people do is to criticize the owners logo unless been told to do so.

for the sake of the thread, Ill just add some of my thoughts.

The Bleach logo
cant see any reason to edit it since its good from the get go, putting white spaces do give some good effect, just not on this one.

The Pluto logo
Havent read the manga but im pretty sure that U signify something, and both typography from sides works with it.

Naruto logo
see what Earendil is saying.
I might agree on gradient though but taking something off from the logo (specially texts that goes with it) is not a good move.

One Piece logo
just look at other peoples comment.
anyways, You might find my words harsh but I do work in graphic Industry and seeing something like this makes me uncomfortable.

take apple for example, just an inch off from their original design can they issue you for Trademark infringement.
I always thought the flames from bleach coincided with the Shinigami stuff. Removing it streamlines it, but I'm just not sure it necessarily is better.

Naruto's looks infinitely better. The blue also double whammy's with Naruto's Rasengan.

One Piece is tough because it looks better now. Though it loses some of the charm that the zany manga/anime brings.
I can see arguments on both sides for the One Piece logo, but one argument that hasn't been mentioned is that the anchor is also a symbol of Luffy, who sinks in water, so it's not needed, like the silhouette, if you're trying to remove redundancies. I like the new logo, especially the font, but I'd cut that rope out of there entirely, since it looks weird just hanging there, and the skull is seen without the rope on Luffy's flag.

That being said, I like the quirkiness of the original logo, even the hand-drawn and inconsistent lettering. It matches the kinetic energy and emphasis on cartoon fluidity of the manga.

Also, what Earendil said, though blue does look better.
I don't want to be mean, but I don't think you really get it. These are logos, not tile cards. They don't HAVE to be 'readable', just "Identifiable". I feel that pretty much all your edits remove dynamic energy from these logos and leave them feeling someone uniform- which is really to opposite of thier goal. A good logo should be disctinctive above all else.
The problem I have is that ... those are not logo. There huge sign that hit straight at your face. There is no need for readability =3=. Changing the shape of the U in Pluto killed every sense of nostalgia =3=
I disagree.
Arguments have been put forth and I stand by them.
I actually have to disagree with you on practically every single count, from a professional graphic designer's point of view. I'll talk ya through it here. You have a lot of talent, I just think more thought is in order.

1. Bleach - The double outlines promote a tightly-knit design with a uniform shape that can be replicated on any product, any color without issue, especially thanks to the myriad of colors and the drop shadow. Yours, with a fade to white gradient and no stroke, fails to pop and wouldn't capture the attention of the target audience.

Most glaringly, however, the white flame orbs are representative of souls in Japan. Thus, the souls on either end reinforce the themes of the story, which is kinda the point. It might lose a bit in translation, but so does anime.

You also couldn't print your logo on red, blue, or pink (katakana). The original could be printed on anything, especially thanks to the shadow.

2. Pluto - The logo is meant to look like the giant robot. Yours removes this aspect, losing the message of the robot and looking more like a martian citiscape. In a graphic novel, you want the logo to reinforce the messages and themes of the story, and yours doesn't do so as well as the original.

Beyond that, the 'X' being not in the center and not joined with 'Pluto' makes them look like separate entities, not one logo, and it the glaring red draws your eye away from 'pluto.'

Also, as with Bleach, you can't print this on red.

3. Naruto - This is the one where you missed the point MOST. The reason for the gradient going side-to-side is to reinforce the 'falling leaves' motif for Naruto's village, so they have a purpose that a top down gradient doesn't fulfill nearly as well.

However, the pink swirl in the background is ESSENTIAL. 'Narutomaki' are japanese fish cakes that have a pink swirl and are sliced and served in Ramen. Naruto is named after these, and his hair is styled after them. It's why he loves Ramen, it's why that swirl is in EVERYTHING Naruto: because of the pink swirl on the Narutomaki. Taking it and making it blue does nothing but remove it from the motif.

Taking out the katakana is a bad move, those shapes help to balance the logo and give it structure. Yours seems to lean to the left.

4. Soul Eater - Taking out the katakana and black stripe is a terrible idea for japan, because most youths won't be able to read the english text. Besides, the extra orange and black binds the design together and create visual interest. Removing them only makes the logo boring. In a Halloween themed logo, you need more than a splash of orange.

They also loose their family relationship, making them loom like separate pieces instead of a continuous logo.

5. Death note - DN DOES have a strong logo, but you're missing the point... it hits the target audience. DN is for darker, grittier fans, who want a more chaotic and dismal, minimalistic storyline close to reality. That's what Deathnote is, and its logo captures that well.

6. One Piece - Your logo is dull, and worse, misleading. The skull and crossbones is also poison, so having that logo with no setup could easily lead people to think it's about poisons for whatever reason. Or skeletons. Or biker gangs, or tattoos. Point is, it's too vague for a shonen jump title!

I'll admit, the anchor could be designed differently, but the rope and anchor reinforce the seafaring theme, especially with the waving motion of the wrapping rope.

The original font is much more piratelike, whereas yours is dull and without spirit.

The red silhouette is there for an important purpose: to balance visual weight. The heaviness of the mugiwara logo in the 'O' is balanced by the attention-drawing red and human form on the other end, and the anchor helps with that goal.

The entire logo is also rectangular, easier to re-size and reproduce, without need to balance your overwhelming white space.

****

All in all, you have serious skills, but you desperately failed to think about the messages and themes of these titles, and worse still, you failed to consider the target audience: young boys.

To get young boys to read these titles, you'll need bright colors, consistency, ease of reproduction (doubly so in Japan), and above all, an easily-interpreted message, even in the logo.

You only have seven seconds to catch your audience's eye, and even less with children. If they can grab a message from the title logo, it's done its job. You can't rely on kids to pick it up and read it for a message, you have to catch their eye immediately.

Deathnote does that, and its logo is for older crowds, 18-25 year olds, not younger people. This is why the original Bleach, Soul Eater, Naruto, Pluto, and One Piece logos are successful and yours fall slightly short.

You logos are good for people our age, for clothes and foods, and even 18-25 aged stories. These are not those stories, I'm sorry to say, even if they do captivate the kid in us.

Except Bleach. I hate that show. Plotholes everywhere, but that's my issue.

Don't give up, you've got a lot of skill! Just remember the target audience and think about reproduction and unity a bit more next time, my friend.
As a P.S., readability isn't most important. Uniqueness and captivating your target audience is most important. After that, it's impact. THEN readability, then reproduction.
Hah. you know this reminds me. I saw a logo for the new Wolverine anime, and when I first read it I thought it said "Holy Erine"
The logo which has bothered me for years is the logo for the American release of フリクリ. They wanted to keep the logo bold like the katakana, so they went with "FLCL". I understand it from an artistic standpoint, but God, do I still hate it when people call the series "Eff Ell See Ell".
That bokeh looks familiar... hehehe
The only thing I didn't like about this article is that you didn't do enough of them! Please please please tell me there will be more! Very interesting read and I felt I got a good lesson in design.
Glitchy Goblin echoed my sentiments to the letter! I am in full agreement with you, good sir. It needs be said that this article is based on pure subjectivity; there are not some all-encompassing graphic-arts standards being masterfully wielded here...
@Glitchy Goblin
RGB and CMYK looks the same in our eyes, the process is what it makes different. RGB, colour of light. CMYK, colour of ink. I can assure you that I can print a red-like image using CMYK (process) w/o any use of any spot colour. (and I know you know what my terms are giving the fact that your working in graphic industry).

I can even print stuff using offset prints with these logo. You just need to convert their RGB element into CMYK. Of course its not perfect from the get go thats why you need proofing to be done.

---------------
enough with the must be done things, he is showing his own thoughts which I respect. No man can please everyone in this world I say.
lmao glad to see that typography and graphic design are popular items of discussion on here, I loved the article I liked a lot of the revisions, though I'm gonna have to agree with Glitchy Goblin on most points, great job either way Ben!
I think these are fantastic! I only think the Soul Eater is now a bit bland and would have tracked the caps on it. LOVE the Bleach logo, very sleek, readable, but maintains the style.

Also, I'm SO glad you changed the gradient on Naruto. That bothered me so much!!! Also, I know that the pink swirl is pink for a reason, but the blue does look better. Hard call on that one.

I agree that the kana shouldn't have been removed. While it may be redundant, it keeps the roots of the anime and manga in the graphic. It's necessary.

nxdu: That's harsh without actual constructive criticism.
HEY EVERYONE, LET'S REMOVE PLUTO FROM THE PLUTO LOGO!

Someone already pointed out how you're wrong about everything so whatever.
@Crobdan yes.
You wouldn't change Death Note? Personally, whenever Viz tacks on th "Shonen Jump" logo on a title it just looks really bad.
i do not think that any of the logos needed any change. most of the titles are pretty popular, and their logos did not change much from the beginning. so apparently they did they're job in representing they're stories intriguingly and are successfully selling to the audiences that the manga artists wanted to target.
@musashi

You're missing my point. Yes, you do know your color processes, but that's not the point.

The original Bleach logo can be printed, unmodified, on any color or product. So, if SJ wanted to throw it on a shirt, in a magazine, display, the works, and it won't matter what color, for the most part.

Without serious modification, his new logo won't work on red shirts, blue shirts, or pink shirts without modification that most printers won't care to deal with. At the very least, using that logo would be more time consuming and costly, plain and simple.
In all honesty, I think he just did a lot of this for the sake of it. I'm a graphic designer myself, and a lot of what I do in my spare time is just for the hell of it.

The original logos are fine.
Everything that Glitchy Goblin said. Knowing your audience is essential, especially when it's kids with attention spans like the one from Dory from Finding Nemo.
Opinions, opinions, opinions,opinions,opinions, opinions, opinions, opinions, opinions, opinions, opinions....


Facebook Shares





Around the web